Why the Market Has Changed
Your IT Procurement Strategy Was Built for a Stable Market. Here's What Changed in 2026.
Executive Summary
An IT procurement strategy is the framework enterprise organizations use to plan, evaluate, and acquire technology hardware. Most enterprise hardware acquisition strategies were built for a market where prices moved in predictable ranges, refresh timelines were reliable, and the central challenge of IT procurement was execution. That market no longer exists.
Hardware prices for enterprise IT equipment are rising faster and less predictably than at any point in recent memory. Tariff-driven cost increases and AI infrastructure demand have disrupted the commodity memory supply that enterprise servers, end-user devices, and networking hardware all depend on. The enterprise IT buying strategy that worked in 2022 carries meaningfully more financial exposure in 2026.
The organizations managing this well are updating how hardware is acquired, not just who it is acquired from.
Table of Contents
Author: Simon Harrsen, EVP North America, CHG-MERIDIAN
Published: May 20, 2026
Author Bio: Simon Harrsen has built his career at the intersection of technology and equipment finance, working across Europe, North America, and South America to help enterprise organizations structure smarter approaches to IT and industrial asset acquisition. As Executive Vice President, North America at CHG-MERIDIAN, he brings particular depth in IT equipment financing and the lifecycle economics that determine whether organizations own, lease, or refresh their technology on the right terms. His work has been published and featured in Channel Insider, Monitor Daily, and Equipment Finance News.
Key Takeaways
- Hardware prices for enterprise IT equipment rose significantly in 2025 and 2026 due to two structural forces: tariff-driven cost increases on imported technology hardware and AI infrastructure demand crowding out commodity memory supply. This is structural price pressure, not a temporary market cycle, and enterprise IT procurement strategies built around stable pricing assumptions are working with the wrong baseline.
- The standard enterprise hardware procurement playbook rests on three assumptions that are all under pressure in 2026: fixed hardware refresh cycles as a reliable planning framework, CapEx budgeting as an adequate model for the full cost of hardware ownership, and vendor negotiation as the primary lever for managing IT equipment costs.
- A modern enterprise IT procurement strategy, also called an enterprise hardware acquisition framework or technology procurement plan, needs to address four things the traditional playbook does not: price predictability across the full acquisition period, refresh flexibility tied to technology change rather than budget cycles, clear depreciation and residual value risk allocation, and a cost structure the finance function can plan around.
- The acquisition model for IT hardware, whether to buy outright, structure a capital lease, or use an FMV operating lease, is a strategic decision that affects depreciation exposure, refresh flexibility, and budget predictability. It should be decided before hardware selection begins, not after.
- A fair market value lease, also referred to as an FMV operating lease or operating lease for technology hardware, structures IT hardware acquisition around use rather than ownership. Monthly payments are fixed, residual value and hardware depreciation risk stay with the lessor, and end-of-term disposition is managed by the financing partner rather than the enterprise IT team.
- Organizations managing large IT device fleets or evaluating consumption-based IT procurement models should consider Device as a Service structures alongside traditional FMV operating lease options when building their enterprise hardware acquisition strategy.
What Has Changed in the IT Hardware Market That Enterprise Procurement Teams Need to Know?
Hardware prices for enterprise IT equipment rose significantly in 2025 and 2026 due to two compounding forces: tariff-driven cost increases on imported technology hardware and AI infrastructure demand crowding out the commodity memory supply that enterprise devices depend on.
Gartner projects worldwide IT spending will reach $6.31 trillion in 2026, up 10.8 percent year over year. But device-segment spending is being compressed because rising memory prices are increasing average unit prices and discouraging planned equipment replacements. According to TrendForce, DRAM contract prices rose approximately 90 to 95 percent quarter over quarter in Q1 2026, driven by AI infrastructure demand absorbing commodity memory supply. Tariff-driven increases have already prompted HPE to raise server prices approximately 8 percent, with Cisco signaling 5 to 10 percent increases on networking hardware.
The pressure on enterprise IT hardware procurement is structural, not cyclical. Technology acquisition planning that assumes stable pricing is working with the wrong baseline.
Why Is the Standard IT Procurement Playbook No Longer Enough in 2026?
The standard enterprise IT procurement playbook rests on three assumptions. All three are under meaningful pressure in the current market.
Are Fixed Refresh Cycles Still a Reliable Planning Framework?
Fixed hardware refresh cycles of three to five years were always a rough heuristic, not a financial optimization. In a stable pricing environment, the enterprise IT buying strategy of holding to a fixed cycle was manageable. In a market where AI demand is compressing hardware generations and memory pricing is volatile, extending a refresh creates compounding risk.
The result is escalating support costs, growing security exposure, and IT equipment that falls further behind the performance curve with each additional quarter it is held. The organization that extends its hardware refresh to avoid current prices often pays more in total maintenance and operational cost than a timely refresh would have required.
Does CapEx Budgeting Adequately Account for the True Cost of Hardware Ownership?
Buying IT hardware outright means taking on the full depreciation curve and residual value exposure. In a stable market, that was a manageable position. In a volatile one, you are making a prediction about what that equipment will be worth at end of its useful life.
In a market where technology generations are compressing and hardware pricing is unpredictable, that residual value prediction carries more financial exposure than most IT procurement best practices frameworks have historically accounted for.
Is Vendor Negotiation Still the Most Effective Cost Lever for IT Buyers?
Vendor negotiation remains a core element of enterprise IT procurement, but it is not sufficient as the primary cost management strategy in this environment. Negotiating 4 percent off a unit price that has risen 15 to 20 percent due to tariff and supply chain pressure manages the edges of a problem that runs deeper.
A hardware procurement approach built primarily around vendor leverage will keep losing ground when the underlying cost structure is shifting this fast.
What Does a Modern IT Procurement Strategy Need to Solve For?
A modern enterprise IT procurement strategy needs to address four things that the traditional hardware acquisition playbook does not adequately handle: price predictability across the full acquisition period, not just at point of purchase; the flexibility to refresh when technology shifts rather than when a budget cycle allows; a clear answer to where hardware depreciation and residual value risk sit; and a cost structure the finance function can approve and plan around. See our guide on IT infrastruture modernization.
These are not entirely new considerations for enterprise technology procurement planning. What is new is how sharply they have come into focus. In a stable market, an enterprise hardware acquisition framework that did not explicitly address any of them still worked well enough. In 2026, defaulting to that approach means accepting financial exposure that has not been priced or planned for.
How Does Your Acquisition Model Become a Strategic Lever?
The acquisition model for IT hardware, how equipment is financed and structured, determines depreciation exposure, refresh flexibility, monthly cost predictability, and balance sheet treatment. In a volatile hardware market, that decision should be made before equipment selection begins, not after.
Most enterprise IT procurement treats acquisition model as a financing formality. Hardware is selected, quantities are confirmed, and then finance determines how to fund it. In a stable market, the order of operations did not create significant risk. In 2026, the acquisition model decision is one of the highest-leverage choices available in enterprise IT procurement planning.
An acquisition structure where hardware depreciation risk transfers to the financing partner rather than sitting on the enterprise balance sheet changes the cost equation in a fundamental way. The organization pays for the use of the equipment, not the ownership of it. At end of term, the IT hardware returns, and the question of what that equipment is worth now belongs to the lessor, not the IT department.
This structure is called a fair market value lease, sometimes referred to as an FMV operating lease or an operating lease for technology hardware. It aligns directly with how enterprise IT equipment is actually consumed: organizations need the performance of current-generation hardware, not ownership of aging equipment at whatever the secondary market will bear in three or four years.
Fixed monthly payments under an FMV lease structure provide the budget predictability that a capital purchase does not. The organization knows its cost from month one through end of term. It does not take an implicit position on what server memory or end-user device pricing looks like at the midpoint of the acquisition cycle.
One consideration often overlooked in enterprise hardware procurement strategy: an independent lessor has no financial incentive to favor a specific manufacturer. Hardware recommendations from an independent financing partner are driven by your application requirements, not by vendor relationships. That independence has real value when IT procurement decisions span multiple hardware categories across multiple OEMs.
End-of-life handling is also shaped by acquisition model. Under an FMV operating lease, the lessor manages remarketing and disposition of returned IT hardware. The enterprise IT team is not responsible for the logistics of equipment retirement, a complexity that grows significantly for organizations managing large device fleets. Organizations evaluating how their acquisition model affects end-of-life responsibilities will find more detail in our guide to the full IT lifecycle.
What Does an Updated IT Procurement Approach Look Like in Practice?
Two scenarios come up consistently in enterprise IT procurement conversations right now, and both follow the same logic: the organization needs hardware, prices have risen, and the question is how to structure the acquisition to avoid carrying residual value exposure on IT equipment it will replace regardless.
An IT director with a hardware refresh due in the next two quarters is facing elevated prices on servers and end-user devices. Rather than submitting a CapEx request at current pricing and carrying the depreciation on equipment that will be replaced in three to four years, the refresh is structured as an FMV operating lease. Monthly cost is fixed and predictable. IT equipment returns at end of term. The organization does not hold end-of-life asset exposure on hardware in a market where that risk is harder to price.
A CFO reviewing a large IT hardware acquisition request is asked to approve a significant capital outlay. Restructuring the acquisition as a fair market value lease removes the upfront capital requirement, converts the cost to a predictable monthly line item, and eliminates hardware depreciation exposure on assets the organization plans to replace regardless.
Rethinking How You Acquire IT Equipment?
CHG-MERIDIAN works with enterprise IT and finance teams to structure hardware acquisition programs built around price predictability, refresh flexibility, and clear risk allocation. If you are approaching a hardware refresh, re-evaluating your current procurement model, or looking for an acquisition structure that works for both IT leadership and the finance team, we can help you think through the options.
To learn more about consumption-based acquisition structures, explore our Device as a Service solutions or contact our team to discuss your specific situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
An IT procurement strategy is the framework an organization uses to plan, evaluate, and finance technology hardware acquisition. A well-designed enterprise hardware acquisition strategy goes beyond vendor selection and unit pricing. It accounts for total cost of ownership across the full acquisition period, refresh timing and flexibility, the financial structure of each acquisition, and where hardware depreciation and residual value risk sit. In practice, it should align the needs of the IT team with the budget visibility and risk tolerance of the finance function.
Effective IT procurement best practices for enterprise organizations include aligning IT and finance teams before the hardware selection process begins, evaluating total cost of ownership rather than point-of-purchase cost alone, building refresh flexibility into acquisition structures, and selecting an acquisition model that accounts for depreciation risk and hardware obsolescence. The acquisition model decision, whether to buy outright, structure a capital lease, or use an FMV operating lease, should be made before hardware selection is complete, not after.
Two compounding factors have made enterprise IT hardware procurement materially more complex. First, tariff-driven cost increases have raised prices on servers, networking hardware, and end-user devices. HPE has already raised server prices approximately 8 percent and Cisco has signaled 5 to 10 percent increases on networking equipment. Second, AI infrastructure demand has significantly compressed commodity memory supply, driving DRAM contract prices up approximately 90 to 95 percent quarter over quarter in early 2026. Together, these forces make the stable-market assumptions built into most enterprise IT procurement strategies unreliable planning tools.
A fair market value lease, also called an FMV operating lease, is a type of operating lease in which an organization pays for the use of IT hardware over a defined term and returns the equipment at the end of that term. The lessor retains ownership and residual value risk throughout the lease. Buying IT equipment outright means the organization takes full ownership, including the full depreciation curve and the end-of-life asset value. For IT hardware that will be replaced at end of term regardless of ownership structure, the FMV operating lease removes the hardware depreciation and residual value exposure that a purchase model carries.
An FMV operating lease provides fixed monthly payments for a defined term, giving the organization cost certainty from the point of acquisition regardless of what happens to hardware pricing during the lease period. It also removes residual value exposure. The organization is not holding an asset whose end-of-life value is harder to predict in a volatile market. For organizations with IT hardware refresh cycles due in the near term, structuring the acquisition as a fair market value lease locks in a known cost structure rather than absorbing ongoing market pricing risk at the point of purchase.
An IT director building an enterprise hardware acquisition strategy should work through four questions before the vendor selection process begins. First, how predictable are the costs of this acquisition across the full term, not just at point of purchase? Second, does the acquisition structure allow for a refresh if technology requirements change before the planned end of term? Third, where does hardware depreciation and residual value risk sit, with the organization or with a financing partner? Fourth, can the cost structure be explained to the CFO and finance team in terms they can plan around? These four questions should shape the acquisition model decision before hardware selection begins.
Procurement is the first stage of the IT asset lifecycle. The decisions made at acquisition, what hardware is selected, how it is financed, and on what timeline it is expected to be refreshed, determine the cost and complexity of every subsequent lifecycle stage, from deployment through maintenance, refresh, and end-of-life disposition. An enterprise IT procurement strategy that does not account for the full IT lifecycle will consistently underestimate the true cost of hardware ownership. This is particularly true for organizations managing large device fleets where the economics of acquisition, support, and disposition are tightly linked.
A capital lease, also called a finance lease, is structured so that the lessee effectively takes on the economics of ownership. The present value of payments represents substantially all of the asset's value, and the lessee typically acquires the equipment at end of term for a nominal amount. A fair market value operating lease, also called an FMV lease, is structured around use rather than ownership. Payments cover the depreciation portion only, residual value stays with the lessor, and end-of-term options include return, renewal, or purchase at fair market value. For IT hardware that will be replaced at end of term regardless of ownership structure, the FMV operating lease is generally better suited because the lessee is not financing ownership of an asset it plans to return.
A CFO evaluating IT hardware acquisition models should consider four dimensions: cash flow timing, balance sheet treatment under applicable accounting standards, impact on key financial ratios, and exposure to hardware depreciation and residual value risk. FMV operating leases and capital leases treat all four dimensions differently, and the right structure depends on the organization's financial position, covenant obligations, and tolerance for asset risk. One consistent advantage of an FMV lease structure in the current environment is the removal of residual value risk from hardware categories where end-of-life value is harder to predict, which describes most enterprise IT equipment right now.
Get in Touch
Simon Harrsen leads CHG-MERIDIAN's North American operations, helping organizations optimize technology investments through smarter lifecycle management. Connect with him to discuss how your business can reduce costs and increase flexibility.
Stay Connected
Learn more
IT Lifecycle Management
ITAD starts at procurement, not disposal. Learn how to manage hardware across its full lifecycle.
FMV Lease vs. $1 Buyout Lease: How to Choose the Right Structure for IT Equipment
Your lease structure shapes your ITAD complexity. Learn what each option means at end of life.
IT Infrastructure Modernization
Modernization triggers ITAD. Learn how to plan upgrades with end-of-life built in from the start.